-
22
Apr
HamsaWeb’s CRIME Report indicates Nokia, the cellular phone giant, has cooperated with Iranian security to enable the latter to arrest students, including bloggers.
Telecom giant Nokia has spiffy slogan: “Connecting People.” But a new report reveals that Nokia may be helping connect the wrong people: Iranian security agents and grassroots dissidents. It seems Nokia has helped Iran install electronic surveillance equipment to intercept text messages, emails, and more. Several activists appear to have been jailed thanks to Nokia’s technology.
Last year, Nokia provided the state-owned Irantelecom with a “monitoring center,” which enables the regime to tap phones, read e-mails, and watch over all kinds of electronic data transmission. Designed to help stop crime and terror, the new surveillance system appears to have enhanced the regime’s ability to crack down on dissent. Last month, twelve women’s rights activists were arrested at a private meeting that security forces likely learned about through intercepts. Another arrested dissident was recently confronted by interrogators with transcripts of his text messaging.
“This is an absolute threat to the privacy of all Iranian activists,” says Hadi Ghaemi, spokesman for the International Campaign for Human Rights in Iran. “It puts them in danger of being constantly monitored by the intelligence services, something that we know is already happening.” Some international advocates are now calling for new laws to prevent Western companies from selling such “dual-use” technology to Iran.
Given Nokia’s membership in the Beijing Association of Online Media, this can hardly be considered a surprise. Here’s what the Far Eastern Economic Review says about that association.
(I)t is clear that BAOM has become an active agent of the Chinese government’s initiatives to stifle discussion of political issues. The group’s slide into censorship shows how easily Beijing can co-opt Western firms into this effort.
Nokia is in illustrious company in its collaboration with the security apparatuses of tyranical governments. That company includes Cisco, Microsoft, Google (including YouTube and Orkut), Yahoo, Facebook, AOL, Skype, Secure Computing, Nortel and many others. The actions of these companies have directly resulted in the deprivation of the freedom, both figurative and physical, of countless patriots from dozens of countries. It has resulted in deep physical and emotional harm done to these individuals and their families. And each officer from each of these companies is directly responsible for this harm. Nokia is a firm, committed member of the “Western” money-for-blood crew.
If you have a Nokia phone, you might want to consider tossing it into the urinal at a public rest room. After all, it would synchronize nicely with the what Nokia’s doing to its users.
- Published by Curt Hopkins in: Alerts
- If you like this blog please take a second from your precious time and subscribe to my rss feed!


Telecom giant Nokia has spiffy slogan: “Connecting People.” But a 




















4 Responses to “Nokia Reaffirms Membership on the List of Western Corporate Collaborators”
As the spokesperson for Nokia Siemens Networks quoted, I just wanted to provide some comments on this thought-provoking article.
Firstly, the company referred to should be Nokia Siemens Networks, not Nokia.
Also, as is stated in the original story:
==========
….the telecommunications industry’s own international standards require that data networks allow law enforcement to intercept phone calls, e-mails and other electronic data.
==========
To be clear here: the capability for lawful interception is a standard feature of all telecoms equipment.
The monitoring center that used to be part of Nokia Siemens Networks portfolio (it has since been acquired by another company) does not undertake lawful interception (a standard function built into all communications networks everywhere), but records and archives data gathered through lawful interception.
On a more general note, the spread of the Internet and mobile communications has enabled access to communications for millions of people who’ve not had it before, and I believe this is of huge social and economic benefit.
It would be very hard to disagree that it is the introduction of widespread mobile communications and Internet access that provides improved insight into abuses of authority, including alleged human rights violations, in all countries.
The fact that all communications, regardless of the equipment and networks they run across, can be intercepted by the relevant authorities in the countries where they are deployed, is part of the internationally agreed standards for telecoms equipment.
Access to the Internet and mobile communications without the capability for lawful interception is not possible.
I feel that where such an emotive issue such as the abuse of human rights is involved, it is vital that the facts are fully understood. This can only help improve the debate on how the global community can work together to better protect and uphold Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
Ben Roome
Ben:
Thanks for the response.
As to the name, Nokia’s what everone calls it, so let’s just stick with Nokia.
As to “lawful interception,” if you knew anything about Iran – and I presume you do – you will know that there is nothing lawful about the interception that Iranian security forces do to students, political opposition and everyday bloggers. You have to know that, Ben, and if you don’t, for G-d’s sake, read ANY of the posts here on the CPB about Iran – or any of Hamid’s posts on Global Voices Online.
That said, I have no doubt that these are the laws as regard telecoms in countries like Iran – and probably many others, if not all. Here’s the thing. You may want to take a note here. Nokia has CHOSEN to operate in Iran, where “lawful interception” results in things like 110-lb, 20-year-old students who publish cartoons of their leaders being given 124 lashes and 2 years in the Iranian equivalent of Pelican Bay (not sure where you’re from – so just imagine the worst prison in your country). Because NOKIA HAS CHOSEN to make money in a country where its technology WILL BE (NOT “might be”) used to find what we would consider innocent kids who will be – among other things – deprived of their liberty, subjected to torture and raped, Nokia has CHOSEN to collude with the Revolutionary Guard of Iran.
If that is Nokia’s policy, then I welcome your telling me to fuck off and that money, and money alone, is all Nokia cares about. But DO NOT TELL ME that you are doing this because it is the law. No law on the earth obliges a Finnish company to help torturers catch children to rape.
It is my belief that “where such an emotive issue such as the abuse of human rights is involved, it is vital that the facts are fully understood.” Nokia is helping an abusive, intolerant regime capture and torture children in exchange for money.
Get out of Iran or admit you don’t care. But, to paraphrase Pompey: Don’t quote laws to us. We carry laptops.
Leave a Reply